Research carried out by
Becky Schaumberg and her colleague Professor Francis Flynn, at Stanford
Graduate School of Business, began with the observation that within
organizations there are always some people willing to take on the tasks that others won't, or take charge of groups that no one else will.
"We started to wonder
'who are these people that rise to the challenge and take responsibility
for the group, and why do they do it?'" said Schaumberg.
To find out what
motivates these types of individuals they conducted a series of
personality tests that measured traits such as guilt proneness, shame
proneness, and extraversion, among others.
Even though guilt and
shame may seem similar to most people, psychologists argue that there is
a crucial distinction between the two.
Shame often makes people shy away from problems whereas guilt makes people approach them.
Becky Schaumberg, Stanford Graduate School of Business
Becky Schaumberg, Stanford Graduate School of Business
"Shame often makes people shy away from problems, whereas guilt makes people approach them," said Schaumberg.
"Shame can also lead to
anger and blaming others for problems, whereas guilt leads people to
take personal responsibility for problems," she added. "It's these
differences that lead us to expect that a proneness to guilt would make
people good leaders, but that a proneness to shame wouldn't."
During one of the
personality tests researchers tried to measure the level of
guilt-proneness in individuals when faced with tricky dilemmas and
scenarios that were likely to elicit feelings of guilt -- such as
receiving too much change at a store and deciding to keep it.
The researchers also put
the volunteers through a series of group exercises, after which each
person was asked to rate their fellow group members on a variety of
leadership criteria, such as leading the conversation and taking charge
of the task.
"We found that
guilt-prone group members were rated as having engaged in more
leader-like behavior in the group exercises than the less guilt-prone
members," said Schaumberg.
In their final study the
researchers found similar results for actual employees when they asked
former colleagues, clients, and managers of current MBA students to rate
them on their leadership ability.
"We found that the more
guilt-prone students were rated as better leaders than the less
guilt-prone students, even when controlling for other important
variables such as intelligence and extraversion," said Schaumberg.
In this study they also uncovered one of the reasons guilt proneness is related positively to leadership.
"Guilt-prone students
felt a great deal of responsibility to those around them. This sense of
responsibility, in turn, made people see them as better leaders," said
Schaumberg.
(They) are willing to be good soldiers and go along with what
benefits the collective, even if that means some individuals may be
harmed.
Becky Schaumberg, Stanford Graduate School of Business
Becky Schaumberg, Stanford Graduate School of Business
But this sense of
responsibility towards others does not just limit itself to people.
Guilt-prone workers also feel guilty towards their organizations when,
for instance, they fail to live up to either their implicit or explicit
expectations of their behavior.
The researchers found
that guilt-prone individuals had a greater sensitivity to their
obligations to their employer than less guilt-prone individuals. This
strong sense of obligation, in turn, made them more supportive of
layoffs as a cost-cutting strategy than less guilt-prone employees.
"We think this shows
that guilt-prone individuals have a strong sense of duty and loyalty to
their groups, and are willing to be good soldiers and go along with what
benefits the collective, even if that means some individuals may be
harmed," said Schaumberg.
But isn't there a risk
that the pressures of leadership could cause a guilty type to end up
consumed by guilt, turning them into a nervous wreck?
"Because guilt-prone
people feel a great sense of responsibility to others, they may end up
taking on more than their fair share of the task," Schaumberg conceded.
"But even though
evidence in some of our other research shows that these individuals work
harder than less guilt-prone individuals, they are not less happy
or more stressed," she added. "In fact, we find that they have more
positive feelings and sense of attachment to their organization than
less guilt-prone employees."
No comments:
Post a Comment