A judge has ordered Twitter to release three months of data from the
account of a user being prosecuted for disorderly conduct related to an
Occupy Wall Street protest on the Brooklyn Bridge last October.
The district attorney's office in New York City wants Twitter to turn
over basic user information from Malcolm Harris' Twitter account
(@destructuremal), and his tweets. Harris' motion to quash the subpoena
to Twitter was denied by the criminal court of the city of New York on
the grounds that Harris had no proprietary interest in the user
information on his Twitter account. Twitter challenged the subpoena, saying users own their Twitter data under the site's terms of service.
This weekend, the criminal court of the city and county of New York disagreed and stood by the initial order.
"We are pleased that the court has ruled for a second time that the
tweets at issue must be turned over," Chief Assistant District Attorney
Daniel R. Alonso said in a statement. "We look forward to Twitter's
complying and to moving forward with the trial."
When asked for
comment, a Twitter spokeswoman provided this statement: "We are
disappointed in the judge's decision and are considering our options.
Twitter's Terms of Service have long made it absolutely clear that its
users *own* their content. We continue to have a steadfast commitment to
our users and their rights."
Civil rights groups ACLU, Electronic Frontier Foundation, and Public Citizen had argued
in a friend-of-the-court brief that because Twitter knows the IP
addresses of users, the court would be enabling prosecutors to bypass
the need for a search warrant as typically required when seeking
location information if a subpoena was granted. The subpoena seeking
three months of Twitter data violated the Fourth Amendment of the U.S.
Constitution, the EFF argued.
But in his opinion, Criminal Court Judge Matthew A. Sciarrino, Jr.
wrote that Twitter users have no reasonable expectation of privacy
because the tweets are public. Twitter must release all of the data for
September 15 to December 30, 2011, but prosecutors will need a search
warrant to get data from December 31, 2011, because it is within 180
days from the ruling, the judge said.
From the decision:
No comments:
Post a Comment